CURRENT AND NEW ELECTION MODEL NL

Bill change political system

The proposal is to form two additional political parties. The first batch will be established as a non-party voters, citizens who abstain from voting, or civilians who deliberately refuse a representative voice.

It should be possible not to let (blank) voters cast their vote: voting does not go to a party that occupied the seats in a room, these chairs (seats) will in fact remain empty.
The number of representatives in the rooms will be diminished. This instead of the active utilization of the votes of those voters - even if they concern the minority of the population - and these blank votes are used for the distribution of all seats.

The creation of a party for the citizens who knowingly vote memorize allows them to actually vote anyway, knowing that their voice will not be assigned to any of the parties with whom they disagree in terms of implementation of party programs. This party aware of non-voters will not occupy chairs in the room and will always abstain.

The second party to be set up would be a party without a political program, with the exception of the duty and the responsibility to ensure the processes of political decision-making and legislation. This second party will not participate in the decision-making and legislative processes, but would vote for or against political decisions, this depending on five criteria.

Any decision made ​​by the Government or any bill which is introduced can only be made ​​if:

1, the proposal that underlies the decision whether the bill is submitted on time;
2, the proposal is clear;
3 the proposal is unambiguous;
4 whether the bill is concrete of the goal that must be achieved with the decision;
5 the interest of the majority of citizens served or at least is protecting its citizens.

Each proposal must be put in on time, so that the party has time to take all necessary qualitative assessments adequately. The reviews on the topics of the proposals should be carried out by specialists in the relevant subjects.

If these specialists conclude that the proposal is correct and legitimate, it meets the 1st criterion and can advance to the 2nd criterion. Each proposal must be clear: any proposal to avoid any ambiguities or misunderstandings rise to be explicit. Each proposal must be clear in order to avoid misinterpretation. Only if the proposal meets these two conditions (criteria 2 and 3), the criteria pass to level 4.

To achieve and to be able to properly assess the objective the proposal must be assessed on the basis of meticulous criteria. Specialists should study the proposal and purpose and determine whether the objective is legitimate and the proposal actually is focused on this goal and is achievable. If the result is positive the proposal make the passage to criteria 4. This party must determine whether the interests of most citizens served or at least protected. Only then the proposal can pass criteria 5 and be implemented.

This party without programme should select members on the basis of morality and integrity, only members with high moral standards should be involved in assessing compliance with criteria 4 and 5. If the proposal is rejected it could pass the 5 stages in a different form again. In cases of great importance or an unclear outcome of the assessment, for example due to conflicting views, a referendum is held.